King_DuckZ/Loki
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Releases Wiki Activity

no message

Browse source 
git-svn-id: svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/loki-lib/code/trunk@136 7ec92016-0320-0410-acc4-a06ded1c099a
This commit is contained in:
humesikkins 2004-03-18 10:57:51 +00:00
parent 3cf210ef61
commit 15f21dd90a
1 changed files with 16 additions and 11 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

27
MSVC/1200/Readme.txt
View file

@ -29,10 +29,15 @@ If you use Singletons with longevity you must add Singleton.cpp to your project/
Fixes:
------
Mar 18, 2004:
-------------
* In SmartPtr.h: Added operator=-workaround for pointer-assignment
* In Functor.h: Changed value parameter to referemce parameter
in FunctorBase and FunctorVoidBase Ctors.
Mar 21, 2003:
-------------
* In MultiMethods.h: Added a new explicit template argument specification (ETAS)-workaround
for FnDispatcher::Add which is more compliant with other
* In MultiMethods.h: Added a new explicit template argument specification (ETAS)-workaround
for FnDispatcher::Add which is more compliant with other
ETAS-workarounds used in this port.
Mar 20, 2003:
@ -275,7 +280,7 @@ Unfortunately the MSVC 6.0 supports neither of them.
[/code]
If you know of a better workaround, please let me know.
Update:
-------
The problem in the example above is Add's nontype-function-pointer-Parameter.
@ -288,11 +293,11 @@ Unfortunately the MSVC 6.0 supports neither of them.
public:
// Etas stands for explicit template argument specification.
// Do whatever you need to do with callback in this class.
template <class SomeLhs, class SomeRhs,
template <class SomeLhs, class SomeRhs,
ResultType (*callback)(SomeLhs&, SomeRhs&), bool symmetric = false>
struct Etas
{/*...*/};
// EtasType has to be a template parameter. If one tries to use
// a parameter of type Etas the MSVC 6.0 won't generate correct
// code.
@ -369,7 +374,7 @@ Unfortunately the MSVC 6.0 supports neither of them.
struct Foo : public Select<IsVoid<R>::value, FooVoidBase, FooBase<R> >::Result
{};
[/code]
The MSVC 6 allows explicit template specialization in class scope.
In contrast the C++ Standards only allows explicit template specialization
in namespace scope. Using the non-compliant feature, the implementation
@ -379,15 +384,15 @@ Unfortunately the MSVC 6.0 supports neither of them.
{
struct FooBase
{
template <class R>
template <class R>
struct In
{
R Func() {return R();}
};
template <>
template <>
struct In<void>
{;
void Func() {}
void Func() {}
};
};
}
@ -395,7 +400,7 @@ Unfortunately the MSVC 6.0 supports neither of them.
struct Foo : Private::FooBase::In<R>
{};
[/code]
Please note that *all* new base classes are only meant as a hidden
implementation detail.
You should never use any of them directly or indirectly. In particular don't
@ -686,7 +691,7 @@ Interface changes:
Dispatcher dis;
disp.Add<Rectangle, Poly, &Hatch>();
[/code]
Using this port the last line either becomes:
[code]
disp.Add(Dispatcher::Etas<Rectangle, Poly, &Hatch>());